<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Adventures in home working &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/tag/it-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com</link>
	<description>I'm Steve Richards a strategist and all round tech enthusiast working on enterprise desktop, application delivery and collaboration solutions. I work from home by the coast in the North West of England.  All the views expressed in this blog are my own.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OCS and Communicator 2007 vs. Windows Live Messenger?</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/15/ocs-and-communicator-2007-vs-windows-live-messenger/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/15/ocs-and-communicator-2007-vs-windows-live-messenger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalProductivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/15/ocs-and-communicator-2007-vs-windows-live-messenger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not a Office communicator user and have often wondered why Microsoft bothered with multiple products in this space.&#160; That was until I read this post,&#160; which described the main reasons that Office communicator is better than WLM.&#160; The level of differentiation really surprised me and it&#8217;s had quite an impact on my thinking since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.fahad.com/pics/microsoft_roundtable.png&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.fahad.com/2006/10/microsoft-office-roundtable-360-degree.html&amp;h=426&amp;w=337&amp;sz=102&amp;hl=en&amp;start=12&amp;sig2=YWLve9Apv9fmwsZU105UUw&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=NH-LWpVR2FzxKM:&amp;tbnh=126&amp;tbnw=100&amp;ei=X7ETR4mfN6auwAGAnalb&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Doffice%2Bcommunications%2Bserver%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN"><img style="border-right: 1px solid; border-top: 1px solid; border-left: 1px solid; border-bottom: 1px solid" height="126" src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:NH-LWpVR2FzxKM:http://www.fahad.com/pics/microsoft_roundtable.png" width="100" align="right"></a>I&#8217;m not a Office communicator user and have often wondered why Microsoft bothered with multiple products in this space.&nbsp; That was until I read this post,&nbsp; which described the main reasons that Office communicator is better than WLM.&nbsp; The level of differentiation really surprised me and it&#8217;s had quite an impact on my thinking since about the difference between web 2.0 and enterprise 2.0.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s the highlights, with a couple of extra benefits I have added in <strong>bold</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Communicator 2007 with OCS is better than using WLM because: </em><br />
<h4><em>Its integrated with the AD, Exchange and SharePoint</em></h4>
<ul>
<li><em>Looks up all the numbers for you, mobile, landline, home etc from contacts or the GAL </em>
<li><em>Uses your calendar to auto set your presence state </em>
<li><em>Takes you to their mysite on right click </em>
<li><em>Presence globes throughout MS Office system, including SharePoint, AD, Outlook, Word, other apps etc.</em></li>
</ul>
<h4><em>Security</em></h4>
<ul>
<li><em>Anyone can sign up for your Windows Live ID and thus pretend to be you (all it says is &#8216;email address not verified&#8217; </em>
<li><em>In WLM you can change your name to someone else. All too easy to change&nbsp;your name and impersonate someone else. </em>
<li><em>When you leave an organisation, your communicator buddy list stays with the company. With WLM you take that list with you </em>
<li><em>Communicator is possible to log conversation centrally, not possible with WLM </em>
<li><em>Because it encrypts the traffic so people can&#8217;t intercept your messages as they travel outside the firewall</em></li>
</ul>
<h4><em>Higher fidelity presence</em></h4>
<ul>
<li><em>You can see at a glance if they are OOF before you email them or IM them </em>
<li><em>With Communicator you have advanced presence such as &#8216;in call&#8217; and &#8216;in a meeting&#8217; which are set automatically </em>
<li><em>You can tag a contact if you are looking for them </em>
<li><em>With Communicator you can also see the presence of those that are NOT on buddy list.&nbsp; This is a big one &#8211; its people you don&#8217;t know that well that you need the most presence assistance with.&nbsp; I&#8217;d have to put the whole company on my buddy list to use WLM for this.</em></li>
</ul>
<h4><em>Phone integration</em></h4>
<ul>
<li><em>Communicator integrates with your phone </em>
<li><em>Can divert calls to the device you choose even mid call </em>
<li><em>Communicator lets you answer the phone on your pc if you like because the two are integrated </em>
<li><em>You can have your phone do simultaneous ring like your desk and mobile </em>
<li><em>Via remote call control, you can see your phone calls come in even when you are not near your phone or mobile and can choose to take them via the pc or send to vmail </em>
<li><em>Is integrated with your voicemail letting you talk to your voicemail inbox from the client </em>
<li><em>With Communicator you can make outgoing and incoming calls from your PC. WLM only does outgoing &#8211; and its nowhere near as good quality (IMHO) </em>
<li><em>You can click on a phone number in a document and it will phone it, you can cut and paste numbers and edit them before dialling</em></li>
</ul>
<h4><em>Enterprise management</em></h4>
<ul>
<li><em>Communicator client is updated once every 3 or so years. WLM has a shorter refresh cycle so requires more effort to maintain in an enterprise </em>
<li><em>You can do multi person video conferencing &#8211; don&#8217;t think you can do that with WLM </em>
<li><em>Can IM a <strong>distribution list</strong></em>
<li><em>Cleaner UI, more corporate</em></li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Extras</strong></em></p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>No adverts</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Great API for programming BOTS and other enterprise integration scenarios</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Integration with web conferencing</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Ability to switch seamlessly from peer to peer mode to client server mode once more than two participants are involved</strong></em></li>
<li><strong><em>Works with Microsoft&#8217;s roundtable video conferencing hardware</em></strong></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Its a pretty impressive list,&nbsp; although I think Lotus SameTime is on track to do an even better job of demonstrating just how different enterprise real-time communication is from consumer grade equivalents.</p>
<p><em>This post is dedicated to Sam &#8211; who is trying to make all this integration work in the real world!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/15/ocs-and-communicator-2007-vs-windows-live-messenger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is SharePoint Facebook for the enterprise</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/is-sharepoint-facebook-for-the-enterprise/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/is-sharepoint-facebook-for-the-enterprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/is-sharepoint-facebook-for-the-enterprise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this interesting post Mike Gotta asks &#8220;Will Microsoft Become Facebook for the Enterprise?&#8221; I think the answer is a definite YES.&#160; Whilst I think there is a role for LinkedIn or FaceBook for inter-enterprise social networking I still think that Intra-enterprise social networking is hugely important and I think that the needs within the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.thewellflorence.com/images/logo_facebook.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.thewellflorence.com/&amp;h=790&amp;w=2100&amp;sz=135&amp;hl=en&amp;start=5&amp;sig2=ZYEhx5meDBsW22Ejd0Hquw&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=aOXWzHlsY6qn7M:&amp;tbnh=56&amp;tbnw=150&amp;ei=gUwRR8POFoaiwAHYw6lb&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfacebook%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN"><img style="border-right: 1px solid; border-top: 1px solid; border-left: 1px solid; border-bottom: 1px solid" height="56" src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:aOXWzHlsY6qn7M:http://www.thewellflorence.com/images/logo_facebook.jpg" width="150" align="right"></a>In this <a href="http://mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/2007/09/will-microsoft-.html" target="_blank">interesting post</a> <a href="http://mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/" target="_blank">Mike Gotta</a> asks &#8220;Will Microsoft Become Facebook for the Enterprise?&#8221; I think the answer is a definite YES.&nbsp; Whilst I think there is a role for LinkedIn or FaceBook for inter-enterprise social networking I still think that Intra-enterprise social networking is hugely important and I think that the needs within the enterprise are much richer.&nbsp; I&#8217;m pretty confident that Microsoft has everything it needs.&nbsp; </p>
<p>SharePoint 2007 strikes me as an excellent foundation upon which to build,&nbsp; its extensibility seems impressive and the fact that it already includes basic versions of all the main elements, blogs, wiki&#8217;s, personal pages and people search provides them with a great learning platform.&nbsp; Mike scores Microsoft pretty poorly so far:</p>
<ul>
<ul>
<li><em>Blogs:B- </em>
<li><em>Wikis:C+ </em>
<li><em>Tag/Social Bookmark System: N/A </em>
<li><em>Social Networking: B+ </em>
<li><em>XML Syndication: N/A (feed aggregation and management)</em></li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>but my point is that it&#8217;s just a matter of time,&nbsp; Microsoft has all the technology infrastructure they need, all the research, all the resources and their B- existing infrastructure is giving them all of the practical experience (Microsoft thrives in practical experience).&nbsp; </p>
<p>I am a little surprised that Microsoft haven&#8217;t purchased <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/" target="_blank">NewsGator</a> though,&nbsp; it seems a perfect complement to their ambitions (both within Windows/Office Live the enterprise) and and it&#8217;s all based on their technologies.&nbsp; Makes me think they must have something up their sleeves.</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t be long though, I suspect we won&#8217;t even have to wait for a new version of SharePoint (but I have no inside information).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/is-sharepoint-facebook-for-the-enterprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of Microsoft office</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/the-future-of-microsoft-office/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/the-future-of-microsoft-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/the-future-of-microsoft-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Office is on the ropes,&#160; there&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that Office 2007 is a great product, I use it every day and I would probably go so far as to say that it&#8217;s a joy to use.&#160; That said I know it&#8217;s showing its age,&#160; it&#8217;s just too difficult to work with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/ThefutureofMicrosoftoffice_14CCD/office12.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" alt="office12" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/ThefutureofMicrosoftoffice_14CCD/office12_thumb.jpg" align="right" border="0"></a> Office is on the ropes,&nbsp; there&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that Office 2007 is a great product, I use it every day and I would probably go so far as to say that it&#8217;s a joy to use.&nbsp; That said I know it&#8217;s showing its age,&nbsp; it&#8217;s just too difficult to work with virtual team members, too complex for the basic stuff I need to do &#8211; day in day out &#8211; and too centered on the specific document I&#8217;m working on rather than improving my overall personal productivity and personal knowledge management practices.&nbsp; Of course with Web 2.0 and Open Source alternatives&nbsp;there&#8217;s now no shortage of great innovation going on that currently &#8211; in my view &#8211; complements Office, but within a year will probably be competing <strong>and I am relieved</strong>.</p>
<p>Relieved &#8211; because Microsoft really needed a big scare, a scare like Linux has given the Windows team, something to shake them out of their comfortable slow cycle of incremental innovation and into the real world.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t think we have even seen a hint yet of what this will mean &#8211; it&#8217;s certainly a lot more than <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2007/sep07/09-30raikesqa.mspx" target="_blank">Office Live Workplace</a>, but I am quietly confident.</p>
<p>Why?&nbsp; because Office 2007 was all about competing with the past,&nbsp; a new UI meant that the Open Source clones hit a brick wall and a new file format meant that competitors needed to spend many development cycles going nowhere implementing the incredibly complex Office XML format.&nbsp; </p>
<p>This leaves the huge Office 14 team to focus on the future, solving the problems of inter-enterprise virtual teams, improved ad-hoc real-time collaboration, collaborative authoring, more transparent offline/online transitions with SharePoint, richer web functionality etc.&nbsp; I have no doubt that Microsoft has the skills (look at SharePoint, OneNote and Excel services for example) it&#8217;s all about the motivation &#8211; and right now their motivation (loss of one of their premier cash cows) must be at an all time high.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m excited by the potential as well,&nbsp; Office is still the most important IT tool I use and I see tremendous potential for improvement if Microsoft gets it right,&nbsp; what&#8217;s equally interesting is to see that IBM are even making a serious attempt at integrating their collaboration tools with Office (Quickr and SameTime) and as a user of both that&#8217;s also very good news.&nbsp; Right now Quickr seems better integrated with Windows for example than SharePoint 2007 is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/10/13/the-future-of-microsoft-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise learning Framework</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/06/05/enterprise-learning-framework/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/06/05/enterprise-learning-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProjectManagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/06/05/enterprise-learning-framework/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been worrying for a long time about how to improve the benefits delivery from investments in desktop, office and collaborative systems and it&#8217;s always bothered me how little attention Microsoft has invested in the problem until now!&#160; They have come up with a&#160;tool called the Enterprise Learning Framework, which follows the lifecycle shown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/images/fb0a1f386a66_102D8/image.png" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="99" alt="image" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/images/fb0a1f386a66_102D8/image_thumb.png" width="377" align="right" border="0"></a>I have been worrying for a long time about how to improve the benefits delivery from investments in desktop, office and collaborative systems and it&#8217;s always bothered me how little attention Microsoft has invested in the problem until now!&nbsp; They have come up with a&nbsp;tool called the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/desktopdeployment/bdd/elf/Welcome.aspx" target="_blank">Enterprise Learning Framework</a>, which follows the lifecycle shown on the right.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple idea &#8211; basically it exposes a whole load of existing material on the Microsoft web site through a simple interface that allows a communications team to identify appropriate content for different audiences at different phases of a project.</p>
<p>The sample below shows a few of the topics that are recommended for &#8220;influential knowledge workers&#8221; to review 1 month prior to deployment.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a great idea much more approachable than previous attempts.&nbsp; However as I reviewed the content I couldn&#8217;t help but feel that it talked as much&nbsp;about potential issues as it did about business benefits.&nbsp; That may be commendable (Microsoft being honest) but it&#8217;s a bit of a worry!&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/images/fb0a1f386a66_102D8/image_3.png" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="322" alt="image" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/images/fb0a1f386a66_102D8/image_thumb_3.png" width="700" border="0"></a> </p>
<p>By way of contrast I watched <a href="http://www.podtech.net/home/3149/zoho-notebook-demoed" target="_blank">this demo</a> of Zoho Notebook and was blown away by the capabilities of this free of charge and legacy free product!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2007/06/05/enterprise-learning-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upgrading to Office 2007 from Office 2007 beta 2</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/14/upgrading-to-office-2007-from-office-2007-beta-2/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/14/upgrading-to-office-2007-from-office-2007-beta-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/14/upgrading-to-office-2007-from-office-2007-beta-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I tried to upgrade from Office 2007 tech refresh, to Office 2007 RTM and received the following error:
Setup is unable to proceed due to the following error(s): 
The 2007 Microsoft Office system does not support upgrading from a prerelease version of the 2007 Microsoft Office system. You must first uninstall any prerelease versions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I tried to upgrade from Office 2007 tech refresh, to Office 2007 RTM and received the following error:</p>
<blockquote><p>Setup is unable to proceed due to the following error(s): </p>
<p>The 2007 Microsoft Office system does not support upgrading from a prerelease version of the 2007 Microsoft Office system. You must first uninstall any prerelease versions of the 2007 Microsoft Office system products and associated technologies.
<p>Correct the issue(s) listed above and re-run setup.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The online read-me that can be found <a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/products/FX101633871033.aspx#1">here</a>, helpfully informed me that:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>The Office 2003 Web Components feature installed with Office 2007 Beta2 causes the Office 2007 product to block its installation. Users should use <b>Add Remove Programs</b> in the Windows Control Panel to Remove the Office 2003 Web Components, and then install the final Office 2007 product. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I searched through Add Remove Programs and could find no sign of the Office 2003 Web Components, so I installed Office 2007 and then downloaded, installed and un-installed the web components with no luck.
<p>At this point I started searching around and found <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927222">this article</a> that explains that the error actually refers to the following much more comprehensive list of software:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>This issue occurs if either of the following conditions is true:
<ul>
<li>A beta release version of a 2007 Office program is still installed on the computer.</li>
<li>A component from the beta release version of the 2007 Office suite or program is still installed on the computer.</li>
</ul>
<p>You must remove all beta release versions of the 2007 Office suite or program from the computer before you install the original release version of a 2007 Office suite or program. <br />Additionally, this issue occurs if any of the following items are installed on the computer: </p>
<ul>
<li>2007 Microsoft Office Add-in: Microsoft Save as PDF or XPS (Beta) </li>
<li>2007 Microsoft Office Add-in: Microsoft Save as PDF (Beta) </li>
<li>2007 Microsoft Office Add-in: Microsoft Save as XPS (Beta) </li>
<li>Microsoft Expression Web Designer Beta 1 </li>
<li>Microsoft Expression Web Designer CTP1 </li>
<li>Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats (Beta 2 Technical Refresh) </li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Interestingly this list doesn&#8217;t mention the Office 2003 web components.</p>
<p>Anyway Office 2007 RTM still failed to install, giving the same error.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Finally I came across the <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/290301">Windows Installer CleanUp Utility</a>, which I ran and discovered that Installer files were still on my machine for several of the uninstalled Office 2007 components even though there was no evidence of them in Add Remove Programs.&nbsp; </p>
<p>After deleting them using this utility Office 2007 seems to have installed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:709a0c96-8f45-4593-aa23-8544f32e783c" contenteditable="false" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/office%202007" rel="tag">office 2007</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/14/upgrading-to-office-2007-from-office-2007-beta-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Direct Push</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/microsoft-direct-push/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/microsoft-direct-push/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalProductivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/microsoft-direct-push/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s direct push technology for delivering email, calendar and contacts from Exchange 2003 SP2/Exchange 2007 to Windows Mobile 5 devices seems to be pretty simple, functional and elegant, even better it&#8217;s being licensed&#160;for use with&#160;other mobile device operating systems.&#160; For more details this blog is a great place to start.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s direct push technology for delivering email, calendar and contacts from Exchange 2003 SP2/Exchange 2007 to Windows Mobile 5 devices seems to be pretty simple, functional and elegant, even better it&#8217;s being licensed&nbsp;for use with&nbsp;other mobile device operating systems.&nbsp; For more details this blog is a <a href="http://www.techatplay.com/direct-push-guide">great place to start</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/microsoft-direct-push/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offline SharePoint 2007</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/offline-sharepoint-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/offline-sharepoint-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalProductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PKM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/offline-sharepoint-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Watch the Microsoft demos and the offline capabilities of SharePoint look really slick, but dig into the details and you find that it&#8217;s not as rosy as you first thought, in fact in some areas, like Excel 2007 integration with SharePoint 2007 it&#8217;s actually worse than in the 2003 products.&#160; To get a much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/OfflineSharePoint2007_14798/network1.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="175" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/OfflineSharePoint2007_14798/network_thumb1.jpg" width="145" align="right" border="0"></a> Watch the Microsoft demos and the offline capabilities of SharePoint look really slick, but dig into the details and you find that it&#8217;s not as rosy as you first thought, in fact in some areas, like Excel 2007 integration with SharePoint 2007 it&#8217;s actually worse than in the 2003 products.&nbsp; To get a much more balanced understanding of just what to expect and what the alternatives are check out this really useful <a href="http://www.colligo.com/webinars/Colligo-MSD2DOct06_files/Default.htm#autostart=1&amp;nopreload=1&amp;event=1">webcast</a>.&nbsp; It&#8217;s sponsored by Colligo who sell a best of breed Offline SharePoint solution, but its not a sales pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/offline-sharepoint-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2007, what will it mean to you</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/exchange-2007-what-will-it-mean-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/exchange-2007-what-will-it-mean-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalProductivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/exchange-2007-what-will-it-mean-to-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This is a great article if you want to get a good overview of the features of Exchange 2007,&#160; these are my favourites:
Voice Messaging System

Voice mail can now be stored in the mailbox and accessed from a unified inbox in Outlook, Outlook Web Access, on a mobile device, or from a standard telephone. This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/Exchange2007whatwillitmeantoyou_145C1/unifiedmessaging1.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="188" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/Exchange2007whatwillitmeantoyou_145C1/unifiedmessaging_thumb1.jpg" width="251" align="right" border="0"></a> This is a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/2007/productevaluation/features.mspx">great article</a> if you want to get a good overview of the features of Exchange 2007,&nbsp; these are my favourites:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Voice Messaging System</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Voice mail can now be stored in the mailbox and accessed from a unified inbox in Outlook, Outlook Web Access, on a mobile device, or from a standard telephone. This unification improves employee productivity by simplifying access to the most common types of communications. It also dramatically reduces cost by removing the need for a standalone voice mail system and by taking advantage of any existing investments in Active Directory. Exchange Server 2007 Unified Messaging can be connected with a legacy private branch exchange (PBX) infrastructure through an IP gateway, or can be directly connected with certain IP PBX installations.
<p><strong>Self-Service Voice Mail Support</strong>
<p>Using Outlook Web Access, users can request a reset of their voice mail PIN, set their voice mail greeting, record their out-of-office voice message, and specify mailbox folders to access when calling in by phone to hear e-mail messages through text-to-speech translation.
<p><strong>Outlook Voice Access</strong>
<p>Users can access their Exchange mailbox using a standard telephone, available anywhere. Through touch tone or speech-enabled menus, they can hear and act on their calendar, listen to e-mail messages (translated from text to speech), listen to voice mail messages, call their contacts, or call users listed in the directory.
<p><strong>Play on Phone</strong>
<p>Exchange Unified Messaging allows users to playback voice messages received in their Exchange inbox on a designated phone. This feature is useful when a user is in a public place and does not want to play the voice mail over their computer speakers. Play on Phone routes the voice mail to a cell phone, desk phone, or other number specified by the user.
<p><strong>Outlook 2007 Experience</strong>
<p>Outlook Web Access, an AJAX application since its first release with Exchange Server 5.5, provides a rich, Outlook like experience in a browser. New features in Outlook Web Access 2007 enable users to:
<ul>
<li>Schedule Out of Office messages and send to internal and/or external recipients</li>
<li>Use the Scheduling Assistant to efficiently book meetings</li>
<li>Access SharePoint documents without a VPN or tunnel using LinkAccess</li>
<li>Use WebReady Document Viewing to read attachments in HTML even if the application that created the document is not installed locally</li>
<li>Access RSS subscriptions</li>
<li>View content in Managed E-mail Folders</li>
<li>Retrieve voice mail or fax messages through Unified Messaging integration</li>
<li>Search the Global Address List</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Search</strong></p>
<p>Information can be quickly found from a mobile device using the search capability of Exchange ActiveSync. When executing a search from a mobile device, both the local device store and the user’s entire Exchange mailbox are queried. Results found through the over-the-air search of the Exchange mailbox can be rapidly retrieved to the device. This capability enables access to information sent or received days, weeks, or even months before, regardless of the storage limitations of the mobile device.
<p><strong>Direct Push</strong>
<p>Mobile devices incorporating Exchange ActiveSync maintain a secure connection with Exchange Server 2007, receiving new or updated e-mail, calendar, contacts, and tasks as soon as they arrive on the server. This push method optimizes bandwidth usage while keeping users up-to-date.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/exchange-2007-what-will-it-mean-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple monitors in Vista</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/multiple-monitors-in-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/multiple-monitors-in-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkSpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HomeWorking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/multiple-monitors-in-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone you read my blog knows that I am a big fan of multiple monitors.&#160; In Vista support for multiple monitors is slightly more restrictive, here&#8217;s a summary:

Multiple monitors attached to a single card &#8211; no problem
Multiple monitors attached to multiple cards with the same driver (which normally means the same chip set family) &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone you read my blog knows that I am a big fan of <a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/blog?cmd=search&amp;keywords=multiple+monitors">multiple monitors</a>.&nbsp; In Vista support for multiple monitors is slightly more restrictive, here&#8217;s a summary:</p>
<ul>
<li>Multiple monitors attached to a single card &#8211; no problem</li>
<li>Multiple monitors attached to multiple cards with the same driver (which normally means the same chip set family) &#8211; no problem</li>
<li>Multiple monitors attached to multiple cards with different drivers &#8211; no support for Glass</li>
</ul>
<p>or more details check out this <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/display/multimonVista.mspx">link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/11/10/multiple-monitors-in-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peer review in the Microsoft Open Source labs</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/13/peer-review-in-the-microsoft-open-source-labs/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/13/peer-review-in-the-microsoft-open-source-labs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/13/peer-review-in-the-microsoft-open-source-labs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft needs to work extra hard to win over members of the Open Source community and their Open Source Software Lab is at the forefront of that work.&#160; One of their recent proposals is to effectively open up their entire research plan to peer review to make sure that they are working in the areas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft needs to work extra hard to win over members of the Open Source community and their Open Source Software Lab is at the forefront of that work.&nbsp; One of their recent proposals is to effectively open up their entire research plan to peer review to make sure that they are working in the areas that their customers want.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Perhaps even more important they will open up each research activity to peer review before it starts so that hopefully the research results will have more authority.&nbsp; This blog post includes the details and the comments make interesting reading.&nbsp; The following extract gives some indication of how the peer review process could improve the quality of the research:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The peer review feedback could let us know (just a sample):</em></p>
<ul>
<li><em>if the hardware used was the kind of hardware that would be used in real world situations?</em>
<li><em>if the topology made sense, or did we need to evaluate different topologies? </em>
<li><em>were the workloads real? </em>
<li><em>what were some common variances in workload?</em>
<li><em>were we using the software to manage and download patches that our peers would use?</em>
<li><em>were there factors like quarterly financial report generation that meant that a realistic experiment would need to span more than the period specified?</em>
<li><em>did the assumed distribution of patches make sense or were there fewer or greater number of patches?</em>
<li><em>did our peers actually care about the failures we would measure? </em></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/13/peer-review-in-the-microsoft-open-source-labs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SharePoint 2007 &#8211; middleware for the masses</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/12/sharepoint-2007-middleware-for-the-masses/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/12/sharepoint-2007-middleware-for-the-masses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalProductivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/12/sharepoint-2007-middleware-for-the-masses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I have been playing around with SharePoint 2007 for a while now and I think I am most impressed by the power that it puts into the hands of IT savvy end users, to create line of business solutions and to enhance these solutions further by integration with Office 2007.&#160;&#160;
It seems to me that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/SharePointmiddlewarefortheedge_13711/appplatform1.png" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="266" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/SharePointmiddlewarefortheedge_13711/appplatform_thumb1.png" width="281" align="right" border="0"></a> I have been playing around with SharePoint 2007 for a while now and I think I am most impressed by the power that it puts into the hands of IT savvy end users, to create line of business solutions and to enhance these solutions further by integration with Office 2007.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p>It seems to me that it&#8217;s these middleware and customization features in SharePoint that set it apart from the competition in this space.</p>
<p>Joe Wilcox talks to the same issue on the <a href="http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/015945.html" target="_blank">Microsoft Monitor blog</a>, where he says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Middleware, you ask? Whatever SharePoint was it certainly isn’t just portal software in the 2007 version. Microsoft has turned SharePoint into a multi-facited product for many business line applications, like business intelligence, workflow and search. Will SharePoint do any of these functions well, or has Microsoft tasked it with too many things? We won’t know until Microsoft gets the software out of beta and businesses put SharePoint into real production use. Functionally, SharePoint Server 2007 is middleware, whatever the origins.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These features are going to be a shock to IT managers and a delight to users, the inability for IT to respond to users needs has already led to an explosion of client side application development using Excel and Access, but now similar rich capabilities are going to be possible using Excel Server, Forms Server and the amazing&nbsp;tricks you can do using just SharePoint lists and workflow. </p>
<p>Fans of web 2.0 technologies will be happy as well with built in support for blogs, and wikis and the fact that pretty much everything in SharePoint 2007 is a list and every list can be RSS enabled!&nbsp; Podcasts are pretty easy as well, just RSS enable a document library, set the RSS feed to include enclosures and drop mp3 files into it and you have a podcast feed.&nbsp; I discuss this in more detail in this <a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/blog/_archives/2006/3/3/1795053.html" target="_blank">previous post</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/bio.php#hinchcliffe" target="_blank">Dion Hinchcliffe</a> has a <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=50" target="_blank">useful post</a> that talks about blogs, wikis and web 2.0 as the next application platform (<strong>I used his diagram above</strong>),&nbsp; I think SharePoint 2007 meets all his requirements, but I think in his model he misses the importance of Lists as a way to make databases more approachable for normal users.&nbsp; SharePoint also offers some pretty compelling integration with Excel and Access for power users allowing easy, bulk data entry, visualization and analysis.&nbsp; </p>
<p>And finally Outlook offers <a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/blog/_archives/2006/8/25/2264608.html" target="_blank">limited offline support</a>, although look to products like those from Colligo for&nbsp;more comprehensive offline support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/09/12/sharepoint-2007-middleware-for-the-masses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offline SharePoint</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/offline-sharepoint/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/offline-sharepoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InformationManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PersonalProductivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/offline-sharepoint/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Although I work from home and tend to be always connected to the Internet, I still find that I really like to use products that allow me to work off-line.&#160; Not only is the performance often better, but it&#8217;s more reliable and I still spend a couple of hours a day disconnected.&#160; lack of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/Intherealworldwestillneedtoworkoffline_11C3B/sharepoint_on_offline.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="285" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/Intherealworldwestillneedtoworkoffline_11C3B/sharepoint_on_offline_thumb.jpg" width="266" align="right" border="0"></a> Although I work from home and tend to be always connected to the Internet, I still find that I really like to use products that allow me to work off-line.&nbsp; Not only is the performance often better, but it&#8217;s more reliable and I still spend a couple of hours a day disconnected.&nbsp; lack of off-line support has been one of the biggest issues with SharePoint 2003 and although I have used Groove as an off-line client I have never been that satisfied with it.&nbsp; Enter Office 2007, which includes off-line support for SharePoint 2007 primarily via Outlook 2007, but also for specific purposes via Groove 2007, Excel 2007 and Access 2007.&nbsp; Take a look at the demos and you will come away pretty impressed, however that&#8217;s the purpose of demos!&nbsp; Take a look at the <a href="http://www.offlinesharepoint.com/" target="_blank">Offline SharePoint blog</a> and you will get a very different impression.&nbsp; </p>
<p>There are many small areas where the off-line experience is just not what you would expect,&nbsp; sometimes only a read-only copy is created, sometimes not all list types are supported, links don&#8217;t work &#8211; the list of limitations goes on.&nbsp; Admittedly <a href="http://www.colligo.com/products/sharepoint/index.asp" target="_blank">Colligo</a> &#8211; the authors of the blog &#8211; make their own tool for offline use of SharePoint but they make no secret of that fact.&nbsp; Anyway if you think all your off-line issues are met then think again, check out the Colligo blog and the Colligo alternative (<a href="http://www.colligo.com/products/sharepoint/reader_home.asp" target="_blank">Reader</a> and <a href="http://www.colligo.com/products/sharepoint/contributor_home.asp" target="_blank">Contributor</a>)and if you want the best Off-line experience&nbsp;it&#8217;s probably still&nbsp;Lotus Notes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting though that neither Microsoft nor Colligo make it easy to get a comprehensive and detailed view of what works off-line and what doesn&#8217;t and in which products.&nbsp; some sort of mega table is required, if anyone knows where to find that information please post a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/offline-sharepoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Knowledge Network &#8211; a different approach to social networking</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-knowledge-network-a-different-approach-to-social-networking/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-knowledge-network-a-different-approach-to-social-networking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InformationManagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-knowledge-network-a-different-approach-to-social-networking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Microsoft&#8217;s Knowledge network looks interesting, it&#160;uses a&#160;client side component to gather information from your PC including email authors and recipients, Outlook contacts, IM contacts, manager (as defined in Active Directory), managers direct reports and your direct reports and SharePoint 2007 colleagues and it also analyses email subject and body text for keywords that reflect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/MicrosoftKnowledgeNetworkadifferentappro_1145F/collaboration1.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="130" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/MicrosoftKnowledgeNetworkadifferentappro_1145F/collaboration_thumb1.jpg" width="147" align="right" border="0"></a> Microsoft&#8217;s Knowledge network looks interesting, it&nbsp;uses a&nbsp;client side component to gather information from your PC including email authors and recipients, Outlook contacts, IM contacts, manager (as defined in Active Directory), managers direct reports and your direct reports and SharePoint 2007 colleagues and it also analyses email subject and body text for keywords that reflect your areas of expertise.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Once assembled you get the chance to decide whether the resulting Keywords, Colleagues, or External Contacts are visible to &#8211; Only Me, My Manager, My Workgroup, My Colleagues, and Everyone.&nbsp; The information is then published into your SharePoint 2007 &#8220;My Site&#8221;.&nbsp; Integrating this information into the My Site is a great idea, because it already contains a lot of rich information about you, including &#8211; if you choose to keep one &#8211; a personal blog as well as AD info about your title, department, manager,&nbsp;group memberships, interests, skills, your picture and your colleagues.</p>
<p>Knowledge Network uses this information to extend the people search capability of SharePoint 2007.&nbsp; You can find out more information about Knowledge Network from the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/kn/default.aspx" target="_blank">excellent blog</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/kn" target="_blank">web site</a>.</p>
<p>If you want a good overview of social networking in general then I recommend <a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/categories/businessInnovation/2006/08/14.html#a1612" target="_blank">this overview</a> from <a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/" target="_blank">Dave Pollard</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-knowledge-network-a-different-approach-to-social-networking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excellent Microsoft briefings available</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/23/excellent-microsoft-briefings-available/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/23/excellent-microsoft-briefings-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/23/excellent-microsoft-briefings-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I do a lot of Microsoft watching, and its pretty difficult to get a good overall impression of what&#8217;s going on in the company.&#160; I have just discovered that all of the briefing sessions from the Microsoft Financial Analysis meeting are now available as online webcasts, even better they also make available all of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/msftfa_thumb.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px" height="95" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/msftfa_thumb.jpg" width="362" align="right" border="0" /></a> I do a lot of <a href="http://steves.seasidelife.com/blog/IT/Microsoft"><font color="#669966">Microsoft watching</font></a>, and its pretty difficult to get a good overall impression of what&#8217;s going on in the company.&nbsp; I have just discovered that all of the briefing sessions from the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/AnalystMtg2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">Microsoft Financial Analysis meeting</font></a> are now available as online webcasts, even better they also make available all of the transcripts and presentations! </p>
<p>These resources provide an excellent checkpoint on pretty much every significant activity that Microsoft is engaged in.&nbsp; The information is pretty high quality, it&#8217;s obviously got a sales feel to it, but the audience is financial analysts so Microsoft are fairly frank about their challenges and the presentations provide a lot of financial insights into both Microsoft and the industry in general.</p>
<blockquote><p>Hint: It&#8217;s a good idea to double click the video in the webcast viewer,&nbsp; at the highest resolution it looks pretty good in full screen and you can just about follow the demonstrations.&nbsp; You might find it useful to download the slides though, as in the full screen view they are difficult to read.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The sessions are not very easy to navigate to though, so as I&nbsp;was watching them I created this list of shortcuts to the key information:</p>
<p>Colleen Healy,<strong> </strong>General Manager, Investor Relations, starts the day with a 10 minute introduction, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/HealyFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21074&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Healy_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>,&nbsp; unless you want an overview of the day you can skip this session.&nbsp; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/steve/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Steve Ballmer</font></a><strong>, </strong>Chief Executive Officer , gives a good 25 minute overview, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/BallmerFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a longer <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/BallmerFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> with demonstrations of Vista and Office 2007 and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Ballmer_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>&nbsp;this session provides a good overview of Microsoft&#8217;s strategy
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/kjohnson/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Kevin Johnson</font></a><strong>, </strong>Co-President, Platforms &amp; Services Division and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/bobmuglia/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Bob Muglia</font></a><strong> </strong>Senior Vice President, Server &amp; Tools Business&nbsp;spend about an hour&nbsp;giving a fairly&nbsp;detailed analysis of infrastructure side of the business, there is a good discussion of how this division supports the other divisions and a good analysis by Bob Muglia of the workloads that Windows is strong in and what they are doing to improve share of workloads they are weak in (HPC, Edge and Internet facing Web), with additional contributions by <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/yusuf/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Yusuf Mehdi</font></a>&nbsp;chief advertising strategist, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/Johnson_MugliaFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a long <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21077&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Johnson_Muglia_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>&nbsp;this session is definitely worth watching, it&#8217;s full of facts and figures and useful insights.
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/jeff/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Jeff Raikes</font></a><strong>, </strong>President, Business Division&nbsp;describes the&nbsp;growth opportunity of the information worker business, and expands that to discuss the Microsoft Business Division more broadly&nbsp;to provide&nbsp;a sense of they are looking&nbsp;at this business, a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/RaikesFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21078&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a>&nbsp;of about 40 mins&nbsp;and a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Raikes_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>, I haven&#8217;t watched this yet.
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/rbach/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Robbie Bach</font></a><strong>, </strong>President, Entertainment &amp; Devices Division introduces his much expanded division which has grown from the Home and Entertainment Division to become the Entertainment and Devices Division, and in the process added mobile and embedded devices; Media Center; responsibility for music, TV, and video; and responsibility for games for Windows, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/BachFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a 40 minute <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21079&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Bach_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/ozzie/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Ray Ozzie</font></a><strong>,</strong>Chief Software Architect, spends about 30 minutes giving an overview of the move to services and how this will impact the relationship between Windows and Windows Live, this is an excellent presentation, it shows that Microsoft have a value proposition that&#8217;s pretty unique and gives a good overview of how Microsoft plan to capitalize on this uniqueness, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/OzzieFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21080&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Ozzie_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>
<p>Ray, Kevin, Jeff and Robbie then field questions so their is no PowerPoint for this session, but the usual <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/QAFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> and <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21081&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> are available</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/turner/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Kevin Turner</font></a><strong>, </strong>Chief Operating Officer, kicks off&nbsp;the afternoon session with a 30 minute presentation, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/TurnerFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21082&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/turner_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/craig/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Craig Mundie</font></a><strong> </strong>Chief Research &amp; Strategy Officer, then gets a 45 minute slot, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/MundieFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a short <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21083&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Mundie_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/liddell/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Chris Liddell</font></a><strong> </strong>Chief Financial Officer gives a 30 minute presentation, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/LiddellFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a short <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21084&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Liddell_FAM_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/steve/default.mspx"><font color="#669966">Steve Ballmer</font></a><strong>,&nbsp;</strong>gives a 45 minute summary, a full <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/Ballmer2FAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> is provided along with a short <a href="vhttp://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21239&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/download/FAM2006/Ballmer_FAM_End_Keynote_2006.ppt"><font color="#669966">PowerPoint presentation</font></a>
<p>Steve, Kevin,&nbsp;Chris and&nbsp;Graig then field questions so their is no PowerPoint for this session, but the usual <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/ExecQAFAM2006.mspx"><font color="#669966">transcript</font></a> and <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21085&amp;MediaUserID=0"><font color="#669966">webcast</font></a> are available</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/23/excellent-microsoft-briefings-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsgator and the future of Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/04/newsgator-and-the-future-of-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/04/newsgator-and-the-future-of-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Richards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT-Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/04/newsgator-and-the-future-of-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago I had a planning session with Microsoft where we discussed requirements for the version of windows to follow Vista.&#160; During that meeting I used newsgator as an example of my ideal service, it embodies in principle &#8211; and increasingly in execution &#8211; all that I see as good in the new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Future" src="http://steves.seasidelife.com/future.jpg" align="right" border="0" />A few weeks ago I had a planning session with Microsoft where we discussed requirements for the version of windows to follow Vista.&nbsp; During that meeting I used <a href="http://www.newsgator.co.uk/home.aspx?GlobRedirect=en-GB">newsgator</a> as an example of my ideal service, it embodies in principle &ndash; and increasingly in execution &ndash; all that I see as good in the new world of service enabled software.</p>
<p>I thought it would be useful to describe some of the characteristics of the newsgator approach:</p>
<ul>
<li>A loosely integrated client and services&nbsp;platform</li>
<li>The services platform only asserts itself when it can add value to the user,&nbsp; otherwise it gets out of the way and lets&nbsp;me get on with the job</li>
<li>An eco-system of different client software optimised to address different platforms, user-types and user preferences, some supplied by newsgator but others just integrated with the services platform using their APIs</li>
<li>Different installations of&nbsp;newsgator online enabled&nbsp;software are aware of activities on the other clients, for example my work client is aware of what I have already read or subscribed to at home</li>
<li>Each installation of a client can optionally have a different configuration, so my work client could be configured differently to my home client if that&rsquo;s what I wanted&nbsp;</li>
<li>A complementary web interface for when an optimised smart client is not available, or for when a web interface is the optimised solution</li>
<li>All of my configuration data is held by the services platform and be easily extracted and moved some place else, in fact other systems can use it in place as it is all url addressable</li>
<li>All (actually nearly all but they are moving in the right direction) configuration data is held by the services platform, so that once I have authenticated to it from a freshly installed client it seems like my environment again</li>
<li>Higher performance than would be possible with a client only approach</li>
</ul>
<p>In summary, the approach provides me with considerable freedom of choice, great performance, optimisation without sacrificing flexibility and openness, pretty inspiring!</p>
<p>Now if Microsoft can do the same thing by utilising Windows Live to make the experience of <em>multiple personal PC&rsquo;s, work and personal PCs, a household of PCs, PCs and Mobiles, multiple identities,&nbsp;sharing&nbsp;data, PC migrations and upgrades etc</em> more seamless and deliver freedom of choice, great performance, optimisation without sacrificing flexibility and openness then I will be very impressed.&nbsp; </p>
<p>It&rsquo;s interesting that watching Ray Ozzie <a href="http://microsoft.shareholder.com/webcast/MediaPresentation.asp?MediaID=21080&amp;MediaUserID=0">perform</a> at the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/AnalystMtg2006.mspx">Financial Analyst meeting</a> recently he definitely seems to have a newsgator-like vision for the eco-system of <em>Microsoft products and services</em>, and some of his recent innovations around the use of <a href="http://www.liveclipboard.org/">Live Clipboard</a> and RSS and <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/rss/sle/">Simple List Extensions</a> seem to indicate that he sees the value in delivering these innovations using standards so there may be hope.</p>
<p>The only thing I really need to round off the newsgator experience is for every bit of configuration data to persist server side (flags, snippets, saved searches etc) and applications that stream down to my new PC automatically with no possibility of conflicts with other applications and no administrative rights to run or install, for that I guess we need them to be .Net <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/clickonce/">ClickOnce</a> applications or&nbsp;wait for Microsoft to build <a href="http://www.softricity.com/products/softgrid.asp">Softgrid</a> like virtualization support into their operating systems and Softgrid like <a href="http://www.softricity.com/products/delivery.asp">streaming</a> into their packaging approach and yes I do know that Microsoft has just acquired <a href="http://www.softricity.com/index.html">Softricity</a>!</p>
<p>This would be a vision for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_as_a_Service">Software as a Service</a> that would really appeal to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://steves.seasidelife.com/2006/08/04/newsgator-and-the-future-of-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
