Microsoft starts to Talk about Longhorn again
Microsoft has started to talk up Longhorn again, so they must be getting more confident as we move towards the release of the beta. Here are some of the main articles and interviews, and my extracts and observations. My overall observation is that these articles show a very feature driven view of Longhorn. Not at all the experience driven vision that was presented at the 2003 PDC. Hopefully this is just because Microsoft are only talking about specific features they feel confident to discuss right now. As the whole Longhorn wave of Operating System, Office tools and third party applications begin to be talked about we will see a real step forward in the user experience. However I don’t think we will really see the vision until we see the client and server vision coming together and by that I mean.
- Longhorn Client and Longhorn Server
- Office Client and Office Server
- WinFS Client and WinFS server and a WinFS integrated SharePoint Server
- Longhorn Client Security integrated with the federated and peer group security features we see glimerings of with ADFS and Groove
- Office Communicator and Live Communications Server extended with Groove like peer group collaboration
- Groove like capabilities built into …


I have speculated before on the subject of Microsoft’s options concerning competing with Linux, but it seems to receive little serious debate, so I thought I must be off track, either technically or commercially. In my view Microsoft would extend its Services For Unix product to comply with the Linux Standard Base requirements and would therefore support Linux applications. For many corporates this would be a dream come true, access to all of the Open Source applications that support either Windows, Linux or both, and of course it would also benefit both users and developers. However Microsoft have told me they have no interest in doing this (but they would wouldn’t they). So in that context it’s interesting to see this article by John Dvorak,