Microsoft: Linux isn’t cheaper
Yet another Linux isn’t cheaper story from Microsoft. I don’t get the focus on cost all of the time. To me cost is a small part of the story. The Linux/Microsoft debate needs to consider the following in this order, (client side):
- The application portfolio that needs to be delivered to the client device. In most enterprises there will be hundreds of client applications, many of these won’t be deliverable on Linux even using emulation.
- Whether you believe in Microsoft’s value proposition. Only Microsoft has the ‘integrated innovation’ value proposition that links client, office tools, infrastructure services and application services. If you buy into that value proposition then you are probably going to continue to use office and Windows. My view right now is that MS is doing a pretty poor job of telling us what that value proposition is in their next generation products, I think because they are still figuring out how to move forward when they are dragging such a legacy behind them
- Whether the user-base can be segmented. Its likely in every enterprise that some users will be best suited to Windows Portables, some Windows Desktops, some Linux and some thin client technologies or one sort …